Writing and running tests¶

Dune tries to streamline the testing story as much as possible, so that you can focus on the tests themselves and not bother with setting up with various test frameworks.

In this section, we will explain the workflow to deal with tests in dune. In particular we will see how to run the testsuite of a project, how to describe your tests to dune and how to promote tests result as expectation.

We distinguish two kinds of tests: inline tests and custom tests. Inline tests are usually written directly inside the ml files of a library. They are the easiest to work with and usually requires nothing more than writing (inline_tests) inside your library stanza. Custom tests consist on executing an executable and sometimes do something afterwards, such as diffing its output.

Running tests¶

Whatever the tests of a project are, the usual way to run tests with dune is to call dune runtest from the shell. This will run all the tests defined in the current directory and any sub-directory recursively. You can also pass a directory argument to run the tests from a sub-tree. For instance dune runtest test will only run the tests from the test directory and any sub-directory of test recursively.

Note that in any case, dune runtest is simply a short-hand for building the runtest alias, so you can always ask dune to run the tests in conjunction with other targets by passing @runtest to dune build. For instance:

$ dune build @install @runtest
$ dune build @install @test/runtest

Inline tests¶

There are several inline tests framework available for OCaml, such as ppx_inline_test and qtest. We will use ppx_inline_test as an example as at the time of writing this document it has the necessary setup to be used with dune out of the box.

ppx_inline_test allows to write tests directly inside ml files as follow:

let rec fact n = if n = 1 then 1 else n * fact (n - 1)

let%test _ = fact 5 = 120

The file has to be preprocessed with the ppx_inline_test ppx rewriter, so for instance the dune file might look like this:

(library
 (name foo)
 (preprocess (pps ppx_inline_test)))

In order to instruct dune that our library contains inline tests, all we have to do is add an inline_tests field:

(library
 (name foo)
 (inline_tests)
 (preprocess (pps ppx_inline_test)))

We can now build and execute this test by running dune runtest. For instance, if we make the test fail by replacing 120 by 0 we get:

$ dune runtest
[...]
File "src/fact.ml", line 3, characters 0-25: <<(fact 5) = 0>> is false.

FAILED 1 / 1 tests

Note that in this case Dune knew how to build and run the tests without any special configuration. This is because ppx_inline_test defines an inline tests backend and it is used by the library. Some other frameworks, such as qtest don’t have any special library or ppx rewriter. To use such a framework, you must tell dune about it since it cannot guess it. You can do that by adding a backend field:

(library
 (name foo)
 (inline_tests (backend qtest.lib)))

In the example above, the name qtest.lib comes from the public_name field in qtest’s own dune file.

Inline expectation tests¶

Inline expectation tests are a special case of inline tests where you write a bit of OCaml code that prints something followed by what you expect this code to print. For instance, using ppx_expect:

let%expect_test _ =
  print_endline "Hello, world!";
  [%expect{|
    Hello, world!
  |}]

The test procedure consist of executing the OCaml code and replacing the contents of the [%expect] extension point by the real output. You then get a new file that you can compare to the original source file. Expectation tests are a neat way to write tests as the following test elements are clearly identified:

the code of the test
the test expectation
the test outcome

You can have a look at this blog post to find out more about expectation tests. To dune, the workflow for expectation tests is always as follows:

write the test with some empty expect nodes in it
run the tests
check the suggested correction and promote it as the original source file if you are happy with it

Dune makes this workflow very easy, simply add ppx_expect to your list of ppx rewriters as follow:

(library
 (name foo)
 (inline_tests)
 (preprocess (pps ppx_expect)))

Then calling dune runtest will run these tests and in case of mismatch dune will print a diff of the original source file and the suggested correction. For instance:

$ dune runtest
[...]
-src/fact.ml
+src/fact.ml.corrected
File "src/fact.ml", line 5, characters 0-1:
let rec fact n = if n = 1 then 1 else n * fact (n - 1)

let%expect_test _ =
  print_int (fact 5);
-  [%expect]
+  [%expect{| 120 |}]

In order to accept the correction, simply run:

$ dune promote

You can also make dune automatically accept the correction after running the tests by typing:

$ dune runtest --auto-promote

Finally, some editor integration is possible to make the editor do the promotion and make the workflow even smoother.

Specifying inline test dependencies¶

If your tests are reading files, you must say it to dune by adding a deps field the the inline_tests field. The argument of this deps field follows the usual Dependency specification. For instance:

(library
 (name foo)
 (inline_tests (deps data.txt))
 (preprocess (pps ppx_expect)))

Passing special arguments to the test runner¶

Under the hood, a test executable is built by dune. Depending on the backend used this runner might take useful command line arguments. You can specify such flags by using a flags field, such as:

(library
 (name foo)
 (inline_tests (flags (-foo bar)))
 (preprocess (pps ppx_expect)))

The argument of the flags field follows the Ordered set language.

Using additional libraries in the test runner¶

When tests are not part of the library code, it is possible that tests require additional libraries than the library being tested. This is the case with qtest as tests are written in comments. You can specify such libraries using a libraries field, such as:

(library
 (name foo)
 (inline_tests (backend qtest)
               (libraries bar)))

Defining your own inline test backend¶

If you are writing a test framework, or for specific cases, you might want to define your own inline tests backend. If your framework is naturally implemented by a library or ppx rewriter that the user must use when they want to write tests, then you should define this library has a backend. Otherwise simply create an empty library with the name you want to give for your backend.

In order to define a library as an inline tests backend, simply add an inline_tests.backend field to the library stanza. An inline tests backend is specified by thee parameters:

How to create the test runner
How to build the test runner
How to run the test runner

These three parameters can be specified inside the inline_tests.backend field, which accepts the following fields:

(generate_runner   <action>)
(runner_libraries (<ocaml-libraries>))
(flags             <flags>)
(extends          (<backends>))

For instance:

<action> follows the User actions specification. It describe an action that should be executed in the directory of libraries using this backend for their tests. It is expected that the action produces some OCaml code on its standard output. This code will constitute the test runner. The action can use the following additional variables:

%{library-name} which is the name of the library being tested
%{impl-files} which is the list of implementation files in the library, i.e. all the .ml and .re files
%{intf-files} which is the list of interface files in the library, i.e. all the .mli and .rei files

The runner_libraries field specifies what OCaml libraries the test runner uses. For instance, if the generate_runner actions generates something like My_test_framework.runtests (), the you should probably put my_test_framework in the runner_libraries field.

If you test runner needs specific flags, you should pass them in the flags field. You can use the %{library-name} variable in this field.

Finally, a backend can be an extension of another backend. In this case you must specify by in the extends field. For instance, ppx_expect is an extension of ppx_inline_test. It is possible to use a backend with several extensions in a library, however there must be exactly one root backend, i.e. exactly one backend that is not an extension of another one.

When using a backend with extensions, the various fields are simply concatenated. The order in which they are concatenated is unspecified, however if a backend b extends of a backend a, then a will always come before b.

Example of backend¶

In this example, we put tests in comments of the form:

(*TEST: assert (fact 5 = 120) *)

The backend for such a framework looks like this:

(library
 (name simple_tests)
 (inline_tests.backend
  (generate_runner (run sed "s/(\\*TEST:\\(.*\\)\\*)/let () = \\1;;/" %{impl-files}))
  ))

Now all you have to do is write (inline_tests ((backend simple_tests))) wherever you want to write such tests. Note that this is only an example, we do not recommend using sed in your build as this would cause portability problems.

Custom tests¶

We said in Running tests that to run tests dune simply builds the runtest alias. As a result, to define custom tests, you simply need to add an action to this alias in any directory. For instance if you have a binary tests.exe that you want to run as part of running your testsuite, simply add this to a dune file:

(alias
 (name   runtest)
 (action (run ./tests.exe)))

Hence to define an a test a pair of alias and executable stanzas are required. To simplify this common pattern, dune provides a tests stanza to define multiple tests and their aliases at once:

(tests (names test1 test2))

Diffing the result¶

It is often the case that we want to compare the output of a test to some expected one. For that, dune offers the diff command, which in essence is the same as running the diff tool, except that it is more integrated in dune and especially with the promote command. For instance let’s consider this test:

(rule
 (with-stdout-to tests.output (run ./tests.exe)))

(alias
 (name runtest)
 (action (diff tests.expected test.output)))

After having run tests.exe and dumping its output to tests.output, dune will compare the latter to tests.expected. In case of mismatch, dune will print a diff and then the dune promote command can be used to copy over the generated test.output file to tests.expected in the source tree.

Alternatively, the tests also supports this style of tests.

(tests (names tests))

Where dune expects a tests.expected file to exist to infer that this is an expect tests.

This provides a nice way of dealing with the usual write code, run, promote cycle of testing. For instance:

$ dune runtest
[...]
-tests.expected
+tests.output
File "tests.expected", line 1, characters 0-1:
-Hello, world!
+Good bye!
$ dune promote
Promoting _build/default/tests.output to tests.expected.

Note that if available, the diffing is done using the patdiff tool, which displays nicer looking diffs that the standard diff tool. You can change that by passing --diff-command CMD to dune.